Google’s New CEO: Back to the Future

However Larry Page decides to lead Google, one thing is for sure: He's non going to be Eric Helmut Heinrich Waldemar Schmidt 2.0.

That's the word coming from industry analysts sportsmanlike days later Page became the CEO of Google. With Schmidt abdication to become the online powerhouse's executive chairman, Page, a CO-founder, is back in the big chair.

And everyone is expecting some significant changes.

"It's same reasonable that Larry is going to sit down and he's departure to reorganize the company," same Colin Gillis, an analyst at BGC Financial, a NY-based investment company. "Larry is winning all over, and atomic number 2's promising to make some encompassing changes and he's likely to do it relatively quick."

Actually, those changes came straight off.

Varlet officially took over as CEO on Monday — the very day that Jonathan Rosenberg, Google's product chief, declared that he plans to resign. By all accounts a highly all-important cog in the Google machine, Rosenberg is expected to exit the company in the approach months. At this charge, it's unclear who will replace him, or if he will Be replaced at whol.

Also on Monday, Google announced that it is bidding $900 million in cash for thousands of patents that Nortel is auctioning forth as part of its bankruptcy proceedings.

Obviously, the decision to make such a huge bid was in the works for some time, and Page must have had a hand in the move while atomic number 2 was transitioning into the CEO's berth. And information technology's non atomic number 3 if Page had been degage with the company while Helmut Schmidt was in boot.

Schmidt, Paginate and Google atomic number 27-founder Sergey Brin have been the triumvirate behind the companion's emanation to the dominant position IT holds today.

The difference, however, is that spell Page has been concentrated on institution, Schmidt was the one making fated that Google was making money and that its shopworn price stayed up.

Straightaway the weight of both concerns — innovation and occupation success — will fall more solidly on Varlet.

"[Sri Frederick Handley Page] has good imaginativeness. He's very much a unattackable noetic. He's a thought-provoking type," said Gillis, adding that Google is a practically different beast than it was when Page front ran it as a inauguration.

"Commemorate: Information technology's a larger send on to crook. It's 200 people versus [24,000 employees today]. It's private company versus a public company. This is a lot different," he said.

And word is that Page would like Google to again constitute run like a hungry young startup — with less bureaucracy and more innovation, and with fewer middle managers and more engineers.

That substance in that location's a potential direction shake-up in the offing.

Rob Enderle, an analyst at Enderle Chemical group, said he wouldn't be surprised if some middle managers were release in the coming months — a move that he thinks would be a big error.

"Google is an engineering company and away nature it would be predominantly engineers," Enderle aforesaid. "However, a firm made up preponderantly of engineers would lack the skills and depth the companion would need."

"Google already is excessively engineering-focused which is part of why they harbour't been able to avoid [angering] governments, and why their image is declining," He aforesaid.

Others think Page merely might be able to inject exactly what Google needs — a dose of agitation and creation.

"As a co-break steeped in applied science and innovation, Foliate is the ideal type of Chief operating officer for a company looking to retake its startup mojo and compete in a predominantly cloud-driven marketplace where speed in engine room matters more generating investor buzz," said Brad Shimmin, an analyst with Electric current Analysis.

"Page can mother a true sense of unity and leading where previously there was confusion and even infighting 'tween the founders and their appointed CEO, Eric Schmidt," helium said.

However, Shimmin warns that Page should be careful to not pinpoint his concentrate on innovation.

"Believe information technology or not, I think Google should slow its rate of innovation, focusing non such on wild ideas such as self-driving cars and or else focus on rising its existing portfolio," he said. "For model, Google Apps should get word sufficient investment to realize it a truly unified, developed and enterprise-central platform open of beating rivals IBM and Microsoft feature for feature."

Both Enderle and Gillis said Page needs to hatful with the company's trust issues.

"Google is at a crossroads," Enderle same, explaining that IT appears to be "unfocused, increasingly difficult to operate with for partners, and a trouble to correct for governments."

"The accompany's image has degraded to a point where few would trust them, and trust is critical to much of what they intend to accomplish in the future," Enderle same. "It is well past time the founders looked into the mirror and realized they get get on a company they wouldn't opt to ferment with. Fixing that problem should be their highest priority."

Sharon Gaudin covers the Internet and WWW 2.0, emerging technologies, and desktop and laptop chips for Computerworld. Follow Sharon on Twitter at @sgaudin, or take to Sharon's RSS feed. Her e-mail address is sgaudin@computerworld.com.